ASUS MB169B 15 6 lightweight USB UK
- 15.6-inch full HD portable USB-powered monitor with a single USB 3.0 cable for power and data transmission
- One of the World's slimmest and lightest USB monitor with a sleek and metallic finish
- Auto-rotating display bundled with the ASUS smart case a two-way adjustable stand and protective sleeve
ASUS MB169B LED monitor 156 lightweight 1920 x 1080 FullHD IPS 200 cdm2 14 ms USB black silver MB169B Monitors Monitors
1920 X 1080 FullHD IPS 200 Cdm2 14 Ms USB Black Silver MB169B Monitors Monitors
ASUS MB169B 15 6 lightweight USB Related Posts
- Anker Portable Multi-Angle Stand for Tablets, e-readers and Smartphones, Compatible with iPhone X / 8 / 8 Plus, iPhone, iPad, Samsung Galaxy / Tab, Google Nexus, HTC, LG, Nokia Lumia, OnePlus and More
- UGREEN Micro USB Cable 1m,USB 3.0 A to Micro B Y Cable with USB 2.0 Charge Cord for Western Digital,Seagate,WD,Clickfree,Toshiba,Elements,Samsung Portable Hard Drives and Samsung Galaxy S5, Galaxy Note 3, Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, Nokia Lumia 2520,Pentax camera etc
- AmazonBasics USB Cable - 3.0 A-Male to Micro B (2.7 m / 9 Feet)
- ASUS MB169C+ 15.6 inch USB Type-C Portable Monitor, FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, Flicker Free, Low Blue Light, TUV Certified
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the top to use one panel or another. And is that the knowledge of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business automation... What is the top screen?
As you know, in the marketplace there is a accomplish offer of screens. There are panoramic, seriously panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to stay straightforward of opting for the 1st one you see or the one that many says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the top PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would give preference to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward get by using to your appropriate screen, but at least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, solutions and severa aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that accommodates nicely by using many of the hiburan subject subject that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use severa aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving technique to those people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of looking at many video clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the seriously panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That would make it feasible for you to give preference to the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a short review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In severa options that do not become seriously panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may possibly think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the many appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important purpose the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking at distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not those people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the in general workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the many controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the top photo good quality as a rule. both by using looking at angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is a lot more desirable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to a lot more desirable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of severa technologies, it is feasible to get by using to a higher performance when playing in a challenging technique the many recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be many appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the many unique option. You can view a lot more code and open many different apps at once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or seriously panoramic panels are very good choices. Another substitute would be to help make use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate one self to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having reachable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who help make use of several programs at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in seriously great definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you deliver the results at 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as programs and severa tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we develop service for solutions give preference to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the court case by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution help make sure you enjoy at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more successful PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of characteristic in games and we will secure to enjoy by using adjustments at great or seriously tier without penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the top right now.